— without failing FCA approval, hiring at £150k, or working a single extra hour.
You're doing the job of three people and it still isn't enough. Here are the seven parts of the sole-compliance-officer load you can legally hand off this month — and how to prove your controls are working, before the FCA ever asks.
Work email address
In your inbox in ninety seconds · No spam, unsubscribe in one click
Find three gaps you can't evidence, or lunch is on me

Written by a sole SMF16/SMF17 holder with two decades at the regulatory coalface, across seven regulators.
Take a guess — then see how often it's the one you'd least expect.
Picture the FCA knocking tomorrow and you don't reach for the binder and pray. You open the monitoring file, the board packs, the change log — and you show them the controls working, line by line, because someone closed the gap months before anyone asked.
Every founder's instinct is “work harder” or “hire someone.” But the maths on a £145k–£175k first-year hire never closes for a role you need ten hours a week — and the FCA says a few-hours-a-week SMF tends to fail approval anyway.
You can't outsource the role. You can outsource the work.
Keep the senior judgement. Hand off the grind. That distinction is the whole game.
Find your firm by AUM or revenue and watch the £37k–£133k a full-time hire costs you in year one — money you don't need to spend — appear in black and white.
The nine control points where the FCA asks “show me it's working,” with the exact evidence that answers each. The gap that fined Monzo.
The seven parts of the sole-officer load you can legally hand off under a retained in-house SMF — and the parts you must keep on your own name.
The regulator's own words on part-time SMFs, and the one structure that's compliant by design. Neutralises the fear before it's raised.
Turns your monitoring into board-ready proof that controls work, before the regulator asks. Goes beyond the dashboard the FCA says isn't enough.
Every return, every schedule, no automatic £250 fees, no supervisory flags. The calendar doesn't care that you're on your own; this map does.
Twelve questions that score your personal liability and tell you the single gap to close first.
What one section 166 review or one un-evidenced control actually costs, next to what real cover costs. The asymmetry that makes the decision obvious.

Asad Bukhory — founder of Artizan Governance. Two decades at the regulatory coalface, across seven regulators, holding sole SMF16 and SMF17 roles personally. The principal who does the work, knows your firm, and tells you straight.
They leave you with a PowerPoint. I leave you with a framework you can run.
Read it. Run the checklist against your own controls. If you don't find at least three specific gaps between what you've documented and what you can evidence — not next quarter, this week — email me directly and I'll personally buy you lunch, anywhere in London. No catch, no small print.
— Asad Bukhory, Founder, Artizan Governance
Doing the Job of Three hands you the seven tasks you can offload, the checklist that proves your controls work, and the maths that ends the hire-vs-stretch debate for good — free, in your inbox, in under ninety seconds. Read it this weekend. Close the first gap Monday.
Free for a limited release. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.