The GRC Navigator
Your Bi-Weekly GRC Intelligence Briefing
The FCA’s confirmation of PS26/3 – the motor finance consumer redress scheme – is the defining regulatory event of this fortnight. With £7.5 billion in estimated redress across 12.1 million agreements, it represents the largest consumer compensation programme the regulator has ever administered. The simultaneous launch of a joint FCA-SRA-ICO-ASA taskforce to tackle claims management misconduct signals that the regulator has learned from PPI: this time, the enforcement architecture is being built before the redress machinery switches on, not after. Firms with motor finance exposure should treat 30 June 2026 as a hard operational deadline, not a planning horizon.
Beyond motor finance, the FCA completed its Regulatory Priorities rollout with sector reports for wholesale markets, wholesale buy-side, consumer finance, and payments – replacing over 40 portfolio letters with a single supervisory framework. The PRA published CP5/26 on liquidity modernisation, three resolution-related policy statements, and the MPC held Bank Rate at 3.75% amid Middle East-driven energy price uncertainty. In enforcement, Dinosaur Merchant Bank received a £338,000 fine for market abuse surveillance failures, while Shojin Financial Services entered administration. Apollo launched its first UK LTAF, and the FCA’s equity market reforms under PS25/17 went live on 30 March. The regulatory calendar is accelerating: firms that treat these priorities reports as background reading rather than board-level action items will find themselves on the wrong side of supervisory attention by Q3.
FCA Confirms Motor Finance Redress Scheme: £7.5 Billion and a New Regulatory Playbookdummyanimatedrotating
The FCA published PS26/3 on 30 March 2026, confirming the final rules for its motor finance consumer redress scheme – the largest consumer compensation programme the regulator has ever designed. The scheme covers an estimated 12.1 million motor finance agreements entered into between 6 April 2007 and 1 November 2024 where lenders paid commission to brokers, with total estimated redress of £7.5 billion.
The scheme operates in two phases. Agreements from 1 April 2014 onwards face a 30 June 2026 implementation deadline, while pre-2014 agreements have until 31 August 2026. Lenders must assess and respond to complaints within three months of the relevant implementation date, with the FCA targeting settlement of the majority of claims by the end of 2027.
- Eligibility narrowed from consultation: The final scope covers 12.1 million agreements, down from 14.2 million proposed. Agreements with commission of £120 or less (pre-2014) or £150 or less (post-2014), zero-APR deals, and cases where firms can demonstrate fair disclosure are excluded.
- Two-tier redress calculation: Undisclosed discretionary commission arrangements or very high commissions (50% or more of total credit cost) trigger full commission refund plus interest. Other eligible cases receive a hybrid remedy: the average of estimated loss and commission paid, plus interest.
- Trigger thresholds: Claims are triggered by undisclosed discretionary commission arrangements, high commissions exceeding 39% of total credit cost and 10% of the loan amount, or contractual ties without visible manufacturer-dealer links.
- Direct access is free: Consumers using the scheme directly pay nothing. Those using claims management companies or law firms may lose up to 30% of their compensation – a point the FCA has emphasised repeatedly.
The structural lesson here is not about motor finance. It is about how the FCA now designs remediation. PS26/3 incorporates explicit lessons from PPI: phased deadlines to prevent operational bottleneck, eligibility thresholds that narrow scope to genuine harm, and a pre-emptive claims management taskforce launched on the same day. Fund managers with exposure to consumer lending securitisations or motor finance portfolios should update their valuation models immediately. The £7.5 billion liability estimate is the FCA’s central case – the actual figure depends on complaint volumes and the proportion of cases that meet the trigger thresholds.
Regulatory Updates
FCA Completes Regulatory Priorities Rollout for Wholesale Markets and Buy-Sidedummyanimatedrotating
The FCA published its 2026 Regulatory Priorities reports for wholesale markets and wholesale buy-side on 19 March 2026, completing the replacement of over 40 portfolio letters with a single public supervisory framework. The reports set out specific expectations for benchmark administrators, asset managers, custody providers, and trading venues.
- Private markets under the microscope: The buy-side report identifies valuation of illiquid assets, conflicts of interest, and investor transparency as priority areas. The FCA will support Bank of England stress scenarios and scrutinise liquidity-redemption alignment in fund structures.
- Consumer Duty extends wholesale: A mid-2026 consultation will consider extending Consumer Duty obligations to wholesale markets. The FCA will also publish findings from its multi-firm review of model portfolio services in Q1 2027.
- Equity market reforms go live: PS25/17 equity market structure reforms took effect on 30 March 2026. A further consultation on equity transparency and market resilience during outages is expected in H1 2026.
- T+1 settlement and innovation: Firms should prepare for the transition to T+1 settlement, dematerialisation of shares, and the FCA’s equities consolidated tape (final rules expected H1 2026).
The shift from portfolio letters to public sector reports is more significant than most compliance teams recognise. Portfolio letters were bilateral and reactive. These reports are public, forward-looking, and create competitive pressure: every firm in the sector can read the same supervisory expectations. The buy-side report’s focus on private market valuations should trigger immediate governance reviews at any firm running illiquid strategies. Boards that treat these reports as background reading will find themselves explaining to the FCA why they missed signals published in plain English.
FCA Consumer Finance Priorities Signal BNPL Enforcement and Credit Act Reformdummyanimatedrotating
The FCA published its inaugural Regulatory Priorities report for consumer finance on 17 March 2026, consolidating supervisory expectations for lenders, debt purchasers, hire firms, and credit brokers into a single document. The report identifies three core priorities: ensuring access to credit that meets consumer needs, supporting consumers struggling with debt, and maintaining a functioning redress system.
- BNPL deadline confirmed: Buy Now Pay Later firms must hold FCA permissions or enter the Temporary Permissions Regime by 15 July 2026. Firms without authorisation after that date will be operating illegally.
- Consumer Credit Act reform: The FCA signals continued work with HM Treasury on modernising the Consumer Credit Act, alongside reviews of the high-cost short-term credit price cap and credit information frameworks.
- Appointed representatives scrutiny: Data-driven supervision of appointed representatives will intensify, with the FCA using its enhanced data collection capabilities to identify outlier firms.
- Financial inclusion mandate: The report explicitly connects Consumer Duty outcomes to financial inclusion, requiring firms to demonstrate how products serve excluded consumers through open banking, budgeting tools, or referral mechanisms.
The 15 July 2026 BNPL deadline is the sharpest enforcement trigger in this report. Any firm offering deferred payment products without FCA authorisation after that date faces immediate regulatory action. For asset managers, the more subtle signal is the FCA’s increasing comfort with using Consumer Duty as a supervisory tool across all consumer-facing sectors. The pattern is clear: Consumer Duty is not a one-off implementation exercise but a permanent supervisory lens.
FCA Payments Priorities Introduce Agentic AI as a Regulatory Dimensiondummyanimatedrotating
The FCA published its Regulatory Priorities report for the payments sector on 25 March 2026, covering firms authorised under the Payment Services Regulations 2017 and Electronic Money Regulations 2011. The report introduces an entirely new regulatory dimension: the FCA will consider whether regulatory changes are needed to support agentic AI payments.
- Open banking expansion: Over 16 million people and businesses used open banking in 2025. The FCA will support the establishment of a Future Entity for open banking and work with HM Treasury on legislation granting the FCA long-term open banking rule-making powers.
- Safeguarding regime: Firms must prepare for the Safeguarding Supplementary Regime coming into force in May 2026, requiring enhanced operational resilience and customer money protection.
- Financial crime as gateway: The report states that financial crime controls are a “gateway requirement, not an afterthought” and notes that unsuccessful authorisation applications have consistently shown inadequate financial crime controls.
- Consumer Duty enforcement: The FCA is moving into active enforcement mode on Consumer Duty compliance, with international payment pricing transparency and vulnerable customer treatment as named focus areas.
The agentic AI reference is the most forward-looking signal in any of the Regulatory Priorities reports. The FCA is positioning itself ahead of a technology shift that most firms have not yet considered from a regulatory perspective: autonomous AI agents making payment decisions on behalf of consumers. Firms building or integrating AI payment solutions should engage with the FCA’s innovation pathways now, before the regulatory framework hardens around early entrants.
FCA and ICO Issue Joint Statement on Vulnerability Data Under Consumer Dutydummyanimatedrotating
The FCA and Information Commissioner’s Office published a joint statement on 27 March 2026 clarifying regulatory expectations for firms handling vulnerability-related data. The statement addresses the tension between Consumer Duty requirements to identify and support vulnerable customers and data protection obligations under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018.
- Data protection is not a barrier: The joint statement confirms that data protection rules do not prevent firms from collecting, recording, or sharing vulnerability-related data when done lawfully and proportionately.
- Practical disclosure mechanisms: Firms should implement systems enabling customers to disclose their circumstances, such as app-based text boxes, dedicated phone lines, or vulnerability scoring derived from transaction patterns and customer interactions.
- Distribution chain sharing: Manufacturers and distributors should share vulnerability information proportionately across the distribution chain, including anonymised or aggregate data, to support product reviews and prevent consumer harm.
- DPIA requirement: Firms processing vulnerability data should conduct Data Protection Impact Assessments for high-risk processing, with clear purpose limitation and security controls.
This joint statement resolves a genuine compliance headache. Many firms have used GDPR as a reason – or excuse – to avoid systematic vulnerability identification. The FCA and ICO are now explicitly stating that both regulatory frameworks can coexist. Boards should ask their data protection officers and compliance teams to present a joint assessment of current vulnerability data practices within 30 days. The firms that move first will have the strongest evidence of Consumer Duty compliance when the FCA conducts its next round of multi-firm reviews.
FCA Launches Investment Trust Listing Rules Review Amid Governance Concernsdummyanimatedrotating
The FCA published a blog on 27 March 2026 authored by Simon Walls addressing investment trust governance, conflicts of interest, and the regulator’s role in shareholder voting disputes. The blog follows the FCA’s 3 March announcement to accelerate its review of UK Listing Rules for investment entities, focusing on board independence and related party provisions.
- Shareholder voting framework: The FCA clarified that voting rights are governed by the Companies Act (one share, one vote) and overseen by the Department for Business and Trade, not the FCA. Boards can reject vexatious resolutions but rarely exercise this power.
- Conflict provisions under review: The FCA is examining whether existing rules on director independence from investment managers and related-party transaction approvals should extend to prospective investment managers and directors.
- Minority shareholder protection: The review will assess whether current protections adequately address scenarios where minority shareholders face conflicts during board appointments, particularly in undiversified investment entities.
This review matters for any firm managing or advising investment trusts. The FCA is signalling that the current governance framework may not adequately address the unique conflicts inherent in closed-ended fund structures. Investment managers should review their own governance arrangements against the FCA’s stated concerns and prepare for potential rule changes that could affect board composition, appointment processes, and related-party disclosure requirements.
The FCA built the enforcement architecture before switching on the redress machinery. That is the real precedent.Asad Bukhory
PRA Developments
PRA CP5/26: Modernising the Liquidity Framework After March 2023 Lessonsdummyanimatedrotating
The PRA published Consultation Paper CP5/26 on 17 March 2026, proposing targeted modernisations to the UK’s prudential liquidity policy framework. The proposals respond directly to the rapid deposit outflows demonstrated during the March 2023 banking turmoil and the Bank of England’s transition to a repo-led, demand-driven reserves system.
- Phase 1 – operational readiness: Firms would be required to demonstrate operational readiness to use central bank facilities as a liquidity management tool, assess and monitor central bank drawing capacity against pre-positioned collateral, and demonstrate severe firm-specific stress scenarios focused on rapid outflows in the first seven days.
- PRA110 reporting changes: The monetisation section of the PRA110 template would cease, with firms instead required to show they can convert assets into liquidity quickly enough to meet acute outflows during stress.
- LCR testing exemption removed: The exemption for annual operational testing of Level 1 Assets in the Liquidity Coverage Ratio would be removed, requiring all firms to prove they can monetise their buffers in practice, not just on paper.
Strategic objectives: The PRA frames CP5/26 around three goals: strengthening liquidity risk monitoring, supporting the Secondary Objective of UK growth and competitiveness, and ensuring the framework remains fit for purpose following market stress events. The shift from static buffer requirements to operational readiness testing represents a fundamental change in supervisory philosophy.
PRA Publishes Three Resolution Policy Statements on 26 Marchdummyanimatedrotating
The PRA published three policy statements on 26 March 2026, finalising amendments to the resolution planning and disclosure framework for UK banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms.
- PS9/26 – MREL reporting: Amends data elements in MRL001 and MRL003 templates, deletes the MRL002 forecast template, and updates SS19/13 on resolution planning. Revised templates take effect 1 January 2027, with Q4 2026 data due in February 2027.
- PS10/26 – resolution thresholds: Updates the Resolution Assessment threshold and Recovery Plans review frequency based on supervisory experience. Effective 1 April 2026, with in-scope firms submitting reports by 2 October 2026 and disclosures by 11 June 2027.
- PS11/26 – Pillar 3 disclosure: Improves disclosure requirements on MREL adequacy and capital distribution constraints. First disclosures required in H1 2027 for the period ending 31 December 2026.
Future Banking Data programme: All three policy statements are framed as part of the PRA’s broader programme to streamline reporting burdens while maintaining resolution framework robustness. The deletion of MRL002 is a rare example of the PRA removing a reporting template rather than adding one – a tangible response to industry feedback on proportionality.
Fund Launches
Apollo Launches First UK LTAF for DC Pension Private Credit Accessdummyanimatedrotating
Apollo announced the launch of the CG Apollo Global Diversified Credit LTAF on 10 March 2026, following FCA authorisation. The fund is the first sub-fund within Apollo’s broader Private Markets LTAF umbrella structure and is managed by Carne Global Fund Managers (UK) Limited as Authorised Corporate Director and AIFM.
- Strategy: Multi-sector private credit solution targeting UK DC pension schemes, with exposure to private investment grade, large-cap corporate lending, and asset-backed finance.
- Market context: Over 25 LTAFs now exist in the UK market, with surveys showing 69-74% of DC schemes planning private markets access via the LTAF structure.
- Regulatory alignment: The launch supports the Mansion House Accord commitment to allocate 10% of DC default funds to private markets by 2030, with a minimum 5% UK allocation.
Mercer Commits £350m to Schroders Private Assets Growth LTAFdummyanimatedrotating
Mercer, a Marsh McLennan business, committed £350 million in initial investment to the Schroders Mercer Private Assets Growth LTAF, designed for UK workplace savings and master trust clients including the Mercer Master Trust and now:pensions.
- Allocation target: The fund supports Mercer’s commitment to the Mansion House Accord, targeting 10% private markets allocation by 2030 with a minimum 5% UK focus.
- Strategy: Diversified private markets exposure across private equity and infrastructure, structured as an LTAF for daily-dealing compatibility with DC default funds.
- Expected timeline: The fund was expected to go live in Q1 2026 following FCA approval.
L&G Private Markets Access Fund Reaches £1.3 Billion in First Yeardummyanimatedrotating
Legal & General’s Private Markets Access Fund reached £1.3 billion in assets under management within its first year of operation, with the associated Lifetime Advantage target date fund range attracting over £11 billion in inflows from DC clients.
- Fund structure: The PMAF is a fund of funds combining a private markets LTAF (structured as a tax-efficient ACS) with liquid securities, enabling daily dealing in normal market conditions.
- DB expansion: L&G expanded PMAF access to defined benefit schemes in 2025, offering weekly dealing terms to accommodate mature schemes’ liquidity requirements.
- Investment scope: Exposure includes clean energy, affordable housing, university spin-outs, and critical infrastructure – asset classes typically unavailable through public markets.
FCA Equity Market Reforms Go Live Under PS25/17dummyanimatedrotating
The FCA’s equity market structure reforms under Policy Statement PS25/17 went live on 30 March 2026, implementing changes to UK equity market rules designed to improve efficiency, competitiveness, and transparency.
- Consolidated tape: Final rules for an equities consolidated tape are expected in H1 2026, creating a single source of post-trade transparency data across UK trading venues.
- Further consultation: The FCA will consult on additional equity market structure and transparency measures, including rules to strengthen market resilience during trading outages.
- T+1 preparation: Firms should prepare for the transition to T+1 settlement alongside ongoing dematerialisation and digitalisation initiatives.
Enforcement
Dinosaur Merchant Bank: £338,000 Fine Exposes CFD Surveillance Gapdummyanimatedrotating
The FCA fined Dinosaur Merchant Bank Limited £338,000 on 27 March 2026 for failures in its automated market abuse surveillance system. The firm introduced a new order system in June 2024 that resulted in CFD trades worth approximately $3.05 billion in asset value going unmonitored between June and October 2024.
- Detection delay: DMBL identified the surveillance gap in October 2024 but did not fix the issue until May 2025 – a seven-month remediation window that the FCA considered unacceptable.
- Regulatory breaches: The firm breached Article 16(2) of UK MAR, SYSC 6.1.1R (systems and controls), and Principle 3 of the FCA Principles for Businesses (management and control).
- Discount applied: The original penalty of £482,900 was reduced by 30% to £338,000 following full cooperation. DMBL ceased CFD sales in May 2025 and the case concluded in nine months.
The nine-month case resolution is the enforcement headline here. The FCA’s Enforcement Watch initiative promised faster outcomes, and Dinosaur Merchant Bank is evidence of delivery. But the substantive lesson is about system change management: introducing a new order system without verifying surveillance coverage is a controls failure that most compliance teams should be testing for in their change management frameworks. Any firm that has changed its order management or execution systems in the past 18 months should verify that surveillance coverage remains complete.
Shojin Financial Services Enters Administration After FCA Interventiondummyanimatedrotating
The FCA announced on 30 March 2026 that Shojin Financial Services Limited, an FCA-authorised crowdfunding platform, entered administration. The platform allowed retail customers to invest in loans funding property development projects. Joint Administrators Simon Carvill-Biggs and Ian Corfield of FRP Trading Advisory Limited were appointed to manage the process.
- Investor impact: Affected customers are being contacted directly by the Joint Administrators. The FCA confirmed it is engaging with both the firm and administrators to ensure the best outcomes for investors.
- Platform model: Shojin operated as a regulated crowdfunding platform under FCA authorisation, channelling retail investment into property development loans – a model that combines illiquidity risk with retail distribution.
- Recovery prospects: The Joint Administrators will work to recover value from the underlying property development companies, though investors may not always be formally classified as creditors in the administration process.
Shojin’s administration adds to a growing list of FCA-authorised platforms that have failed while channelling retail money into illiquid property investments. The pattern is consistent: platforms promise diversification and professional management while exposing retail investors to development risk, concentration risk, and liquidity risk that most institutional investors would hedge or avoid entirely. Compliance teams reviewing their firm’s distribution arrangements should ask whether any partner platforms are operating models that create similar maturity mismatches.
FCA Launches Joint Taskforce to Combat Motor Finance Claims Misconductdummyanimatedrotating
The FCA announced on 30 March 2026 the formation of a joint taskforce with the Solicitors Regulation Authority, Information Commissioner’s Office, and Advertising Standards Authority to tackle poor practices in motor finance claims management. The taskforce was launched on the same day as PS26/3, the motor finance redress scheme.
- Coordinated enforcement: The four regulators will share intelligence and take coordinated action against unsolicited and misleading advertising, meritless claims, multiple representation, and unfair exit fees.
- Scale of prior action: Before the taskforce launch, the FCA had already removed or amended 800 misleading advertisements, freed 28,000 consumers from contracts, and reduced fees for over 500,000 consumers via action against three claims management companies.
- SRA investigations: The SRA reported 89 open investigations into 71 law firms as of 31 January 2026, with seven firms already closed.
This is the FCA learning from PPI in real time. During PPI, claims management companies captured a significant proportion of consumer compensation through aggressive marketing and opaque fee structures. By launching the claims taskforce on the same day as the redress scheme, the FCA is attempting to set enforcement expectations before the claims industry scales up. The message to consumers is clear: use the free scheme directly. The message to CMCs and law firms is equally clear: the regulators are watching from day one.
Market Developments
MPC Holds Bank Rate at 3.75% as Middle East Tensions Drive Energy Prices Higherdummyanimatedrotating
The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee voted unanimously (9-0) to maintain Bank Rate at 3.75% at its meeting concluding on 18 March 2026, with the decision published on 19 March. The hold reflects rising near-term inflation risks driven by conflict in the Middle East, which has pushed global energy and commodity prices higher.
- Unanimous decision: All nine MPC members voted to hold, compared with recent meetings where one or two members had voted for further cuts. The unanimity signals genuine concern about the inflationary outlook.
- Energy price transmission: Middle East-driven energy price rises are expected to feed through to CPI inflation in the coming months, with potential second-round effects on wages and prices.
- Rate trajectory: Bank Rate was last cut to 3.75% in December 2025. The next MPC decision is scheduled for 30 April 2026, where the Committee will reassess the balance between disinflation progress and geopolitical price pressures.
The unanimous hold is the signal that matters. When MPC members who had been voting for cuts switch to hold, the monetary policy outlook has shifted materially. Fund managers running interest rate-sensitive strategies should recalibrate their assumptions: the market-implied path for Bank Rate may need to be repriced if Middle East tensions persist through Q2. For compliance purposes, firms should review their interest rate stress scenarios to ensure they capture the possibility of rates remaining at or above current levels for longer than previously modelled.
FCA Rejects Complaints Commissioner Findings on British Steel Pension Schemedummyanimatedrotating
The FCA responded on 26 March 2026 to the Financial Regulators Complaints Commissioner’s final report on the British Steel Pension Scheme advice scandal. Commissioner Abby Thomas upheld complaints against the FCA, concluding that the regulator was “consistently behind the curve” in anticipating, preventing, and responding to the crisis.
- Commissioner’s findings: The report criticised the FCA for slow action on banning contingent charging despite known conflicts of interest, inadequate oversight of adviser qualifications and professional indemnity insurance, and failure to gather real-time data during the BSPS “Time to Choose” window.
- Redress delivered: The FCA stated that at least £106 million has been offered to 1,870 former BSPS members, alongside enforcement action against over 20 individuals and firms. Over 6,500 members have been assisted via the Financial Ombudsman Service and FSCS.
- FCA’s rejection: The regulator rejected the central findings, maintaining that its actions were “reasonable and proportionate” based on available information at the time, and highlighting post-incident improvements including the ban on contingent charging for DB transfers.
The BSPS report is a governance lesson for every regulated firm, not just advisers. The Commissioner’s central criticism – that the FCA was reactive rather than anticipatory – mirrors exactly the criticism firms face when their own governance failures emerge. Boards should read this report not as regulatory history but as a case study in what happens when monitoring systems rely on lagging indicators rather than real-time intelligence. The question for compliance teams is whether their own surveillance frameworks would detect a similar pattern of harm before the regulator did.
Equity for Growth (Securities) Limited Enters Liquidationdummyanimatedrotating
The FCA announced on 26 March 2026 that Equity for Growth (Securities) Limited has entered liquidation. The firm was an FCA-authorised entity whose clients are being directed to the firm’s appointed liquidators for further information about the status of their investments and any recovery prospects.
- Regulatory status: The firm’s FCA authorisation is expected to be cancelled following the completion of the liquidation process.
- Client impact: Affected clients should contact the appointed liquidators directly. The FCA has confirmed it is monitoring the liquidation to ensure orderly wind-down and appropriate client communication.
- FSCS eligibility: Clients who have suffered losses may be eligible to claim compensation through the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, subject to the standard eligibility criteria and limits.
Calendar
April 2026
- 1 Apr PS10/26 resolution assessment threshold changes take effect
- 15 Apr CP26/5 sustainability disclosure consultation responses due (extended)
- 30 Apr MPC interest rate decision
- Late Apr FCA expected update on Consumer Duty wholesale extension consultation
May 2026
- Early May Safeguarding Supplementary Regime for payment and e-money firms takes effect
- Mid-May FCA expected consultation on equity market structure and transparency
- Late May PRA CP5/26 liquidity framework consultation responses expected
June – July 2026
- 30 Jun Motor finance redress scheme implementation deadline (post-April 2014 agreements)
- H1 2026 FCA equities consolidated tape final rules expected
- 15 Jul BNPL firms must hold FCA permissions or enter Temporary Permissions Regime
- Late Jul FCA expected to publish Consumer Duty multi-firm review findings (MPS)
Key Dates Later in 2026
- 31 Aug Motor finance redress implementation deadline (pre-April 2014 agreements)
- 2 Oct PS10/26 resolution assessment reports due from in-scope firms
- 1 Jan 2027 PS9/26 revised MREL reporting templates take effect
- 1 Jan 2027 PS11/26 Pillar 3 disclosure amendments take effect
- Q1 2027 FCA multi-firm MPS review findings publication
The FCA’s new Regulatory Priorities reports replace portfolio letters with public, sector-wide expectations. Every firm in your sector can now read exactly what the regulator will scrutinise. If your competitors can see the same supervisory roadmap you can, what is your board doing to move from compliance to competitive advantage? How are you turning regulatory transparency into strategic differentiation rather than treating it as a box-ticking exercise? We’d welcome your perspective. The best responses may feature in a future edition.
We’d welcome your perspective. The best responses may feature in a future edition.
The motor finance redress scheme is not just a consumer protection story. It is a test case for how the UK regulatory state manages systemic financial remediation in the post-Brexit era. The FCA has designed PS26/3 with explicit lessons from PPI: phased implementation windows, eligibility thresholds that narrow the scope to genuine harm, and a pre-emptive claims management taskforce that treats parasitic intermediaries as a supervisory risk rather than a market inevitability. For fund managers with exposure to consumer lending portfolios, the £7.5 billion liability estimate demands immediate attention in valuation models and due diligence frameworks.
The completion of the Regulatory Priorities rollout marks a structural shift in FCA supervision. Portfolio letters were bilateral, reactive, and often outdated by the time firms received them. The new sector reports are public, forward-looking, and explicitly designed to create competitive pressure: when every firm in your sector can read the same supervisory expectations, the firms that act fastest gain an advantage. The wholesale buy-side report’s focus on private market valuations and liquidity-redemption alignment should prompt immediate governance reviews at any firm running illiquid strategies within daily-dealing structures.
Board members should commission a mapping exercise this week: take each relevant Regulatory Priorities report and identify the three areas where your firm’s current controls fall furthest short of the stated expectations. Present that gap analysis at the next board meeting with a remediation timeline. The firms that treat these reports as strategic intelligence rather than compliance reading will be the ones the FCA holds up as examples of good practice when it publishes its first sectoral assessments in 2027. The rest will be explaining to their boards why they missed the signal that was published in plain English on the FCA’s website.
To receive our bi-weekly regulatory insights directly in your inbox, subscribe to The GRC Navigator:
Subscribe NowFounded by Asad Bukhory, helps financial institutions turn GRC challenges into growth assets.
Navigation
Copyright © 2026 Artizan Governance | All Rights Reserved